🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.